<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Operators in Ioke and Prolog and DSLs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiago.org/cc/2009/01/09/operators-in-ioke-and-prolog-and-dsls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiago.org/cc/2009/01/09/operators-in-ioke-and-prolog-and-dsls/</link>
	<description>Software engineering in a computational biology environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaveh Shahbazian</title>
		<link>http://tiago.org/cc/2009/01/09/operators-in-ioke-and-prolog-and-dsls/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaveh Shahbazian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiago.org/cc/?p=68#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Very nice! I like io very much and it seems ioke is going to be a more pragmatic io. :)

You should take a look at http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/. Pure is a modern-style functional programming language based on term rewriting. It seems interasting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! I like io very much and it seems ioke is going to be a more pragmatic io. <img src='http://tiago.org/cc/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You should take a look at <a href="http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/</a>. Pure is a modern-style functional programming language based on term rewriting. It seems interasting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://tiago.org/cc/2009/01/09/operators-in-ioke-and-prolog-and-dsls/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiago.org/cc/?p=68#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Very good post; for declarative arithmetic, check out constraint logic programming in Prolog. For example, in SWI Prolog, there are the clpq, clpr and clpfd libraries, which give you arithmetic in all directions (as opposed to the one-way evaluation of other languages).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post; for declarative arithmetic, check out constraint logic programming in Prolog. For example, in SWI Prolog, there are the clpq, clpr and clpfd libraries, which give you arithmetic in all directions (as opposed to the one-way evaluation of other languages).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Aaron</title>
		<link>http://tiago.org/cc/2009/01/09/operators-in-ioke-and-prolog-and-dsls/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiago.org/cc/?p=68#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Haha, nice point, I agree completely. I have never thought of comparing Ioke with Prolog, but this does make complete sense from a declarative DSL perspective.

I do hope lispy languages like Ioke get more mindshare. There is a treasure chest of wonderfully valuable and useful concepts waiting to be discovered...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, nice point, I agree completely. I have never thought of comparing Ioke with Prolog, but this does make complete sense from a declarative DSL perspective.</p>
<p>I do hope lispy languages like Ioke get more mindshare. There is a treasure chest of wonderfully valuable and useful concepts waiting to be discovered&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
